1 April 2025
April Fool's
18 February 2025
Cheating Culture in Asian Societies
- How reputation concerns and confucian values influence cheating behavior
- Impressions on sexual unfaithfulness and their accuracy show a degree of universality
- Factors Contributing to Infidelity in Marriage Within Asian Countries A Systematic Review of Literature
- Why 84 Percent of Women in Japan Think Cheating is Healthy?
- What is Cheating Culture in Japan Really Like?
- Adultery and Infidelity in China
- Half of married Korean men have cheated: study
- Our Cheating Hearts
- Korean Political Scandal
24 January 2025
WEF 2025 AI
Key Topics for WEF 2025 for AI:
- Responsible AI Development and Governance
- AI Impact on Industries
- AI Role in Addressing Global Challenges
- Future of Work in Age of AI
- Building Trust in AI
- AI and Geopolitics in Competition and National Security
- AI and Environment in Climate Action and Conservation
- AI and Human Rights in Bias, Discrimination, and Human Dignity
- AI and Future of Healthcare in Personalized Medicine and Healthcare Delivery
- AI and Creativity in Generated Art, Music, and Human Creativity
- AI and Education in Learning, Teaching, and Workforce
- AI and Industry in Smart Factories, Electric Vehicles, Supply Chain, and Agentic AI
- Ethical Implications of AI in Superintelligence and Singularity
2 January 2025
Cybertruck
Possibly, one the ugliest cars on the market. It is now also the deadliest after exploding outside of Trump Tower. The design especially is impractical, lacks usability, comfort, and a safe driving experience. This car falls short on a number of areas.
- Unconventional Design: angular stainless steel exterior that is easy on dings and dents
- Limited Visibility: narrow windows are problematic on visibility and safety
- Ride Quality: stiff suspension, mostly for off-road use, with uncomfortable driving experience on roads
- Interior Aesthetics: ugly interior to compliment the ugly exterior
- Unproven Technology: questionable, hit and miss technology
29 December 2022
Hypocrisy of Climate Change Activists
Climate change activists alert the world of the effects of having a high carbon footprint. However, one only needs to look at these activists and realize how hypocritical they really are in their own lives. Take for example Greta Thunberg. She talks about climate change and yet uses a plane, lives in a house, consumes electricity, produces waste, celebrates xmas, lights up a tree, receives gifts that use wrapping paper, while complaining on the world stage as how everyone has ruined her childhood. And, all her supporting crew had to be just as hypocritical in building their own carbon footprint just to enable her to travel via a zero-emissions sailboat and jet set around the world, provide for freeze dried meals that use plastic wrapping, the use of train, and the amount of water needed to grow cotton for t-shirts. Most climate change activists can't live without electronics and internet. She even seems to have a social media presence. One generally has to use the internet to be active on social media. According to estimates, all the gadgets, the internet, and systems we use today equate to 3.7% of the global greenhouse emissions. And, when one looks at it in realistic terms, her complete carbon footprint is greater than an average individual on the planet. And, in the time that she has taken center stage, has she provided any quantifiable and qualitative evidence with a set of constructive solutions? During conferences and summits one can see her ranting to the audience but passing on technical questions for other people to answer. Is this an indication of her being totally out of touch with reality? People that posture and rant to others while not practicing what they preach makes them rather hypocritical as they appear to have lived in a very protected environment of self-entitlement and don't seem to understand the complex social constructs and the global dynamics of the world.
19 August 2022
The Satanic Verses
'The Satanic Verses' can be downloaded from the archive for free. Don't bother buying the book as it is not a good read. In fact, it is garbage from any sense of the word. The entire book is filled with embedded hate speech. The author dispels many of his hate through the personification of characters. Not only does he hate everything and everyone, he seems to also hate himself. The book was written to offend and provoke, much of which can be seen from the quote at the beginning of the book from Daniel Defoe. The more significant bit of hate speech is directed towards women that not only incites hate but also violence. In 1989, an incident occurred against a woman in New York where six individuals after reading passages from the book went out to put it into action that conjured up their imaginations. The book not only hates on blacks, but also jews, brits, whites, women, hindus, and across the protected characteristics. In US, hate speech laws don't really exist much outside of incitement. However, in UK/EU the hate crime law can provide a way towards censorship of the book. After all freedom of speech is not absolute. One finds it surprising that there is a lot of focus around the hate for a given religion while much of the other forms of hate in the book are completely overlooked. Perhaps, this is because of racism and bigotry shared in much of the western societies towards Islam and the book provides a weapon to incite hate towards it. But, it is shocking that many do not notice the level of hate speech mentioned in the book towards women. The author is an opportunist. Who wanted to gain notoriety by being as controversial as possible. In fact, a lot of the writing is in broken sentences and swearing that do not amplify any form of literary quality. The author cannot even make up his mind whether he wants to swear in hindi or english. It reads like an indian version of an urban dictionary. This leads one to wonder why on earth would someone want to consider it for the Booker Prize. The book sales is an indicator of how it is viewed in society. Book sales increased after the fatwa. They further increased after the attack on the author. But, in between such events book sales were virtually unheard of. Many people who support the book are jumping on the bandwagon of crowd follower mentality and have never even read the book. However, the man that attacked the author may also be exercising their freedom of speech and expression. This could be compared to the egg attack on John Prescott who returned it with a punch. Book burning is also another form of freedom of speech and expression. And, apparently, one cannot even challenge the holocaust behind the curtain of freedom of speech and expression. Or, even challenge the use of additional pronouns in freedom of speech and expression. We live in a society of hypocrites.
Extracts from 'The Satanic Verses':
- "White women -- never mind fat, Jewish, non deferential white women -- were for fucking and throwing over. What one hates in whites -- love of brown sugar -- one must also hate when it turns up, inverted, in black. Bigotry is not only a function of power."
- "Torture. Maggie the Bitch."
- "N****r eat white shit?"
- "Black shit is bad?"
- "Sister Fucking British"
- "This country that's stuffed full of fucking old corpses"
Prologue (by Daniel Defoe, from 'The History of the Devil'):
"Satan, being thus confined to a vagabond, wandering, unsettled condition, is without any certain abode; for though he has, in consequence of his angelic nature, a kind of empire in the liquid waste of air, yet this is certainly part of his punishment, that he is....without any fixed place, or space, allowed him to rest the sole of his foot upon."
2 June 2022
The Dog That Stepped On A Bee
This story is about a victim and an abuser. For some odd reason, society expects the man to always play the role of abuser, while the woman is expected to play the role of the victim. However, in modern day society women neither want to be seen as victims nor do they want men to be chivalrous. They want the legal system to always side with women whether it were wrong or right - to throw away the burden of proof. Whatever happened to the concept of innocent until proven guilty is a typical question one asks when the biased media is seen jumping to conclusions. Since when has the "metoo" movement just been about women? The clash of genders seems like women are all too confused about the definition of equality. Or, is it the fact they want to play the victim card when it suits them? Is the "metoo" movement more about "metoohatemen" movement? Equality is when one sees things beyond the biases of gender stereotypes. However, with equality of opportunity also comes equal levels of consequences for punishment and responsibility for actions. There should be no cause of special treatment for women just because they are women. There should be no drum down special treatment for abusers just because they are women and have softer hands or that they are smaller in stature than men. In the trial for Depp vs Heard, we see what society would define as a type of anomaly of reversed gender roles between victim and abuser. In fact, this trial gives a confident voice to male victims of domestic violence who are often laughed off by women. And, here in lies the truth. To seek the truth one must look beyond the biases and through the spectrum of evidence. Only then can one seek justice and equality. Women should acknowledge when they are wrong and learn to take responsibility for their actions just like men. When one takes an oath, they should uphold that oath to their testimony. Over the years we have seen a shift in the legal system that has gradually sided with women over men in matters of divorce, domestic violence, harassment, abuse, abortion, child custody, and discrimination. But, this only implies that no justice is truly blind. Are our legal courts becoming increasingly biased in their sentences and accountability for justice? Perhaps, it begs one to ponder on the philosophical question of whether justice is a vice or a virtue.
14 August 2020
30 January 2020
Event Monitoring
- DiffEngine
- Edgi
- Huginn
- Klaxon
- Lighthouse
- Newsdiffs
- Nytdiff
- Pagelyzer
- Siteseer
- Beehive
- Memorious
Premium:
- ChangeDetect
- ChangeDetection
- ChangeTower
- Diffbot
- Distill
- Fluxguard
- Followthatpage
- OnWebChange
- PageFreezer
- TheWebWatcher
- TimeMachine
- Tackly
- Versionista
- Visualping
- Wachete
- WatchThatPage
9 October 2019
7 June 2019
GeoPy
3 May 2019
16 January 2019
23 March 2017
Entrepreneur First
Entrepreneur First