10 April 2025

GNNs and Figurative Speech

Figurative language, the art of deviating from literal meaning for rhetorical effect, is a cornerstone of human communication. Metaphors, similes, irony, and personification enrich our expression, adding layers of nuance and emotional resonance. However, for artificial intelligence, particularly traditional natural language processing models, deciphering these linguistic deviations has long been a formidable challenge. This is where Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) emerge as a powerful and uniquely suited architecture, offering a pathway to a more nuanced understanding of figurative speech by explicitly modeling the intricate relationships inherent in its interpretation.

The strength of GNNs in tackling figurative language stems from their fundamental ability to represent and reason over interconnected data. Unlike sequential models that process text linearly, GNNs construct a graph representation of the input, where words or concepts become nodes, and the semantic or syntactic relationships between them form edges. This graph-based approach mirrors the very nature of figurative language, which often relies on establishing non-literal connections and mappings between disparate concepts. 

Consider a metaphor like "The internet is an information superhighway." A literal interpretation would focus on the individual meanings of "internet," "information," "super," and "highway." However, the figurative meaning arises from the implicit mapping of characteristics: the internet, like a highway, facilitates the rapid movement of entities (information vs. vehicles), has infrastructure, and connects different locations. GNNs can excel here by explicitly modeling the relationships between these concepts. By representing "internet" and "highway" as nodes and the underlying similarities (facilitates movement, has infrastructure) as connecting edges, the network can learn to identify the non-literal correspondence and thus grasp the metaphorical meaning. 

Similarly, GNNs are adept at handling simile, which explicitly draws a comparison using "like" or "as." While seemingly simpler, understanding the underlying shared attributes requires identifying the relevant features of both entities being compared. A GNN can represent the two entities as nodes and the features they share as connecting edges, allowing the model to focus on the salient similarities that drive the figurative meaning.

Irony, with its reliance on a contrast between literal and intended meaning, poses a significant challenge for models focused solely on surface-level semantics. Detecting irony often requires understanding contextual cues, social norms, and the speaker's implied attitude. GNNs can incorporate contextual information by expanding the graph to include surrounding words, speaker information, and even sentiment cues as nodes and edges. By reasoning over this interconnected web of information, the GNN can identify discrepancies between the literal statement and the broader context, thus enabling the detection of ironic intent. 

Furthermore, personification, which attributes human qualities to inanimate objects or abstract concepts, benefits from the relational reasoning capabilities of GNNs. Understanding "The wind whispered secrets through the trees" requires recognizing the human action of "whispering" and mapping it onto the sound produced by the wind interacting with trees. A GNN can model the wind and trees as nodes and the "whispered secrets" as a relationship characterized by human-like communication. By learning these types of non-literal attribute transfers across the graph, the model can effectively interpret personified language.

The ability of GNNs to perform reasoning over paths within the graph is also crucial for understanding complex figurative expressions. For instance, understanding a complex analogy might require traversing multiple relational links to identify the underlying structural similarity between two seemingly disparate domains. GNNs can learn to identify these relevant paths and extract the essential mappings that constitute the figurative meaning. 

The inherent graph-based structure of GNNs makes them exceptionally well-suited for the task of understanding figurative speech. By explicitly modeling the relationships between words and concepts, GNNs can capture the non-literal connections, contextual cues, and underlying mappings that define metaphors, similes, irony, and personification. As research in this area continues to advance, GNNs hold immense promise for enabling AI systems to move beyond literal interpretations and truly grasp the richness and complexity of human figurative language, paving the way for more nuanced and human-like communication.

Periodic Table of Figurative Speech

Figures of Speech